Sound familiar?
Materials scattered across ten chats, progress living in each teacher's head
- Every teacher runs their own chat, their own spreadsheet, their own routine
- No single system for students, payments, and materials across all programs at once
- What worked for one teacher falls apart once there are five
- The administrator manually tracks who teaches whom and who's paid for what
An institution with 100–300 students doesn't need (and shouldn't need) an in-house IT person. What it needs isn't another hire — it's an outside team running the platform, so your academic staff can focus on teaching instead of administering accounts.
Sound familiar once you pass three teachers? The schedule breaks first, followed by a shared level curriculum, and the most expensive break is a teacher leaving — taking the lesson history and part of the group with them. For more on what breaks and in what order, see «The school grew from one teacher to eight. Here's what breaks first». And if the question isn't “what breaks” but “who runs all this technically” — that's answered in «We don't have our own IT person. So the platform isn't for us?».